It's been over a week since Osama bin Laden was killed, and its taken me that long to reflect on the event. Not that I've been struggling over whether the world is a better place without him; it clearly is. But it is the manner of his death that has preoccupied me. There have been some Catholic clerics weighing in on bin Laden's death, and most have in some way echoed a Vatican official's comments that, while the action was justified considering the evil this man had perpetrated in the past and the threat to world peace he still posed, it shouldn't be taken as an opportunity to gloat, but rather to reflect. There has been some debate over the justification for killing bin Laden, considering conflicting reports that have him unarmed when the SEALs came charging into the house. Couldn't we have captured him? Some ask, though admittedly not many: was this really a just use of lethal force?
My gut reaction was not not very theological to be honest; I simply didn't care how it was done, I was just content that it was finished. Osama bin Laden was a man of violence, an apostle of the the culture of death who got caught up in his own whirlwind of hate. It wasn't that he got what was coming to him, so much as he got what was going to get to him sooner or later. When Jesus told Peter that those who live by the sword die by the sword I don't believe he was making a sweeping pacifist statement, as many theologians today would claim. There is a legitimate right to self defense which the Church has always acknowledged in word and action (let's remember that the Swiss Guards don't carry water pistols). We live in a fallen world where not everyone wants to live in peace, and where some see those who do as weak and contemptuous. So we have guns and fighter planes and bombs while working for the day we never have to use them again. A perfect world? Not by a long shot, and all the protests and binding resolutions won't make it so.
So what does Jesus mean by warning Peter not to live by the sword? I believe Jesus was speaking of those who make violence a way of life, who have adopted the ways of war and terror as their primary option when faced with conflict and injustice. They unleash powers beyond their control, because once the cycle of violence has been started no one knows where it will end. War can make good people do evil things because nothing ever goes by plan once the bullets start flying. While we were justified in going to war with the Axis Powers in World War II, and I don't believe there is a moral equivalency between the two sides, we shouldn't think atrocities weren't committed all around.
I met a man recently who was in Vietnam who told a story I shall not repeat in detail here. Even though it wasn't a confession; the man didn't know I was a priest when he told me the story, I'm not sure I can get myself to type the words. It was a story of revenge and murder on a large scale. By the time he came home after his tour of duty he had already lost God, abandoning himself to a life of dissolute living. It was years before he could come to grips with what had happened on that dark night half a world away. He eventually found Christ again, and now dedicates his time and money to helping at risk youth. Even though he didn't say it, I knew it was his way of trying to make amends for the sins of his past life. This is a good, decent man who willingly participated in a horrendous thing. If but for the scourge of war this nightmarish detour in his life wouldn't have happened.
War destroys and perverts innocent lives, but for those who are the masters of war the end often comes swiftly and unprovided for. Whether it's Hitler in his bunker, Mussolini being hung upside down in the city square or bin Laden in his hideout last Sunday, there is usually no trial, no due process, no peace. In these cases we have the forces that were unleashed by their hatred eventually coming back to visit them. Is this God's vengeance? I would say it's closer to what Eastern religions call karma. More precisely it's natures way; the type of end that comes to a person who makes living by the sword his defining habit.
Does this mean we shouldn't question the means used to bring bin Laden to his final end? No it doesn't. We should never lower ourselves to the level of the unjust aggressor, and always strive for greater justice. I must admit that my initial reaction was not the right one. But I still can't say that I lament this man's passing either. He set upon a course long ago that only had one logical conclusion; the question was only from what direction the bullet was going to come from.
No comments:
Post a Comment