The Archbishop of Newark, John J. Myers, recently issued a pastoral letter
reiterating the Catholic teaching on marriage as a union between one man and
one woman (the executive summery can be found here). In it he called for Catholics who dissent from
the Church’s teaching, on this and other essential doctrines, to re-examine
their consciences. If they cannot give
their ascent then they should, “in all honesty and humility,” refrain from
receiving Communion. He makes a
distinction between people who struggle with sin but make an effort to repent
if they fall and those who are “not even trying.” Worse yet are those who, either publicly or
privately, teach others to contradict the Church’s teaching in word and
deed. As gently as the Archbishop tried
to couch his words, this is a strong message that I know many have a hard time
with. Part of the problem is not simply
that many of us have difficulty agreeing with the Church’s traditional teaching
on human sexuality, we also have a basic misunderstanding of the Eucharist
itself and what it means to receive communion.
To understand the Archbishop’s words on the proper way to
dispose ourselves to receive Holy Communion we must see the Mass in its entirety. We begin by asking God’s forgiveness for our
sins. Then we hear and respond to the
Word of God in the Scriptures. After this
the deacon, priest or bishop “breaks the bread of the Word of God” for the
congregation by way of the homily. This should
not be the minister’s personal musings on life, or even the Bible, but be
reflective of the Tradition out of which our understanding of the Word comes
from. At this moment he is acting as a prophet;
a true messenger of God does not speak on his own behalf but on behalf of the One
who sent him. Then we rise and profess
our faith by way of the words of the Creed.
This is no random action, but is placed at that part of the Liturgy on purpose.
We have opened ourselves to God’s presence, heard of the great works that
He has done for His people, been instructed on how the lessons of the Scripture
apply to us today, and now we say amidst the Christian Assembly that we believe
what has been received. We do not
believe our own interpretation of God’s Word, but we believe in common with the
entire universal Church.
We make this proclamation before receiving Communion. When
the minister presents the consecrated host and says the words “The Body of
Christ” we are to respond “Amen.” That
Amen packs an abundance of meaning. We are
saying we believe in the True Presence, that Christ is entering into the temple
of our body, uniting us with Him. We are
also saying that we are united to all the other people in the world who are
saying that same Amen, forming and strengthening the Mystical Body of Christ. We are united with the Church Triumphant in
Heaven as well as the Church Suffering in Purgatory. We are united through the ages in a
transcendent reality. We are saying I
believe and am united in mind, heart and body with all that Christ taught and
how that teaching has been handed down through the centuries by the guidance of
the Holy Spirit. That belief is
encapsulated in the Creed we have already professed; it was professed for us by
our parents and Godparents at baptism, in our own name at Confirmation and we
renew that belief before taking the Eucharist.
Receiving Communion is not simply a personal action. It says we are united in faith with the
entire community. The link between Creed
and Communion is driven home during Lent when some parishes follow the ancient
tradition of dismissing the catechumens (those adults preparing for baptism)
after the readings. They cannot profess
their belief yet, and so are not present for the Eucharist. In parishes that do this the candidates go off
to reflect on the readings and receive further instructions.
Our faith seeks understanding. To take the Eucharist does not mean that we “get
it” all in an intellectual sense, but that in faith we trust in Christ, who is
the Way, the Truth and the Life. We
trust that he has given us shepherds who are guided by the Spirit, headed here
on earth by the Pope who was given special gifts of grace that go along with
the mission he was given. Are the
bishops and the Pope “supermen” incapable of making mistakes? Of course not. Peter, the first pope, made his share of mistakes,
and even denied our Lord three times.
But when Jesus asked him “Who do you say that I am,” he answered with
the truth, by God’s help. We are saying
I believe that that divine assistance is still present to our bishops in spite of
their unworthiness. This is not for
their sakes, but for the benefit of the faithful.
No one wants to be told that they should not participate in
the Eucharist. I know that Archbishop
Myers’ words offended some, possible many. But he preached the truth, as hard as it may
be to hear. We need to be honest, taking
in the entire Gospel, then asking ourselves if we truly believe and have the
proper dispositions to encounter Christ in the Sacrament of unity. Then and only should we say “Amen,” for then
we would be speaking the truth.
No comments:
Post a Comment