Saturday, February 22, 2014

Consistory of Cardinals Discuses Family and Married Life


The Consistory of Cardinals that met in Rome this week was preparing for October's Extraordinary Synod of Bishops that will concern itself with the Church's pastoral care of married people and families. We can't underestimate the importance of the upcoming meetings, as well as the regularly scheduled Synod set for 2015 which will continue the discussion. Synods are held normally every three or four years, but these extraordinary synods, called by the pope when he feels that they're necessary, are not all that uncommon.

What is different this time is that Pope Francis plans on using the synod as a catalyst for possible changes, not in doctrine, but in pastoral practice. A complaint by some over the years is that both Blessed John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI used these more as information sessions, with information going from the top down, more than as opportunities for the bishops to collaborate with the pope. Whether these criticisms are fair or not, Pope Francis wants to change the perception, at the very least.

And he's beginning with a hot button topic; how the Church cares for divorced and remarried Catholics who didn't have the first union annulled, or are first time married, but in civil unions. Right now Catholics who find themselves in these situations are not supposed to receive the sacraments, particularly Communion and Reconciliation (Confession).

There are two basic points of view and both, as far as I can see, have their merits. The first is that Jesus is very clear, from Matthew 19, that marriage is an indissoluble bond. There are only two ways a person can walk away from a marriage. The first is to prove that some conditions existed at the time the partners exchanged vows that renders the sacrament invalid, thus null and void in the eyes of the Church. Or else, by way of what we call the Pauline Privilege, when two non-Christians marry and one converts to Christianity while the other opposes and puts serious obstacles in the way of the believing partner's practice of the faith. This is based on 1 Corinthians 7:10-15. While it's a sad situation, and we encourage these people to stay close to the community, in light of justice they are living in a persistently sinful condition which renders a turning away from the offending behavior nearly impossible, and so receiving the sacraments itself becomes an occasion of sin.

The other point of view is that Christ was merciful, and the Church's pastoral response needs to reflect mercy more than strict justice. The annulment process is long and arduous, and many give up or don't even begin when they see all that is involved. What do we do with people who may have been married briefly early in life but have been with their second spouse happily for decades? Surly this alone could be seen as a sign that the first union was invalid, even if it's difficult to prove juridically?  The Eastern Orthodox churches, who also see marriage as a sacrament, allow second, and even third marriages, though the ceremonies are rather penitential in nature, as opposed to the joyously ornate ceremonies surrounding a first wedding. Some say that judging the validity of the first marriage should be made by the individual conscience, others that some juridical process, albeit streamlined, would still need to be maintained. Both agree that a mistake made early in life shouldn't translate into decades of separation from the sacraments, which then could only be received when death is imminent. 

I must be honest, I struggle with this. Some on both sides see things in very cut and dry terms, but not me. Jesus is clear about divorce and remarriage being an occasion for adultery.  He was also merciful with sinners, especially those who were "victims of human passion," as Don Bosco called those who committed sexual sins. I do know that something has to be done. There are too many good, sincere people caught having to chose between their marriage and following their faith. These are people I meet almost everyday. So, I pray that the Holy Spirit enlightens the bishops as they gather and discuss, and the Pope as he makes his decisions, that we reach the right balance between justice and mercy in our pastoral practice.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

I don't know Father. Once you start playing with doctrine it can only lead to getting farther from the Truth. I look at what happened with the protestants when they started allowing for contraception in only certain conditions. That hasn't worked out so well. I realize we are not talking about changing doctrine, at least I hope not, but even just adjusting it for pastoral reasons can be tricky. Jesus was clear about sin.....

And Jesus said, Neither do I condemn you (compassion); go, and do not sin again (conversion).

Many only look at the first part and say see Jesus did not judge, He is merciful. But the second part is just as pastoral as the first. Compassion for this life, conversion for the next.

And I think of all those who did faithfully go through the process to get an annulment to follow the Church's teaching.

Well I will be praying for the Holy Father and the Cardinals in any case. And you too Father! God Bless!

Anonymous said...

Nothing good shall come of this!

The interest here is not truth. It is elsewhere. Of that, I am convinced.


An Abandoned Husband/Father

PS.

Thank you for having the courage to allow anonymous comments.

Fr. Tom Provenzano, SDB said...

Fr. Tom Responds to johnnyc and Anonymous:

I understand the concerns of both johnnyc and Anonymous, and so approach the upcoming Synod with caution. At the same time we need to have the discussion. I absolutely agree with johnnyc that innovations introduced among Protestant communities, not just in terms of contraception, but women's ordination and the general leniency on sexual morality, have had negative results. Far from making these ecclesial communities more relevant they've lost their counter cultural edge that is the mark of vibrant Christianity. I do see this as different than these other issues because the Eastern Orthodox Churches have maintained a different discipline that has never been condemned by Rome, even if it hasn't been adopted up to now.

Anonymous, I think you are the same Commenter with No Name who has left messages here in the past, and while I do filter out some comments, it's never for someone wanting to maintain their privacy. Know of my prayers for you, that in the Lord you find healing and hope.